Comments on: Feynman ‘Fun to Imagine 2: Fire

By: Eastleigh6

Eastleigh6 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@cyberflo999 we’ll …
@cyberflo999 we’ll first of all i don’t believe in religion… and second i really won’t come on here like i have all the answers or like I know alot of scientific phenomena [because i don't]…as we progess through life, over the years to come better technology will come up and maybe we’ll REALLY understand where we came from…but besides that i think the main goal of science is just that..trying to search for the void thats missing…But good statements you make

By: cyberflo999

cyberflo999 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 (4- …
@Eastleigh6 (4- and last…) This, they call evolution, not intelligent design. For unlike you, they say “here’s what we know; here’s how the world works, how we understand it to work so far from our experiment. That’s it.”.
They don’t – can’t – acknowlodge God’s imprint on it because things can be explained without the concept of God.
The truth religion claims are not to be questionned. That’s an unfortunate way of thinking.

By: cyberflo999

cyberflo999 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 (3-) …
@Eastleigh6 (3-) Those amazing things are called cellular automata.
Then, biologist explained why it seems to work so well at our scale. that’s because if it doesn’t work for some plant, or animal, if a tree instead of fixing carbon and releasing oxygen somehow does the opposite, this individual dies, along with all the one carrying the same burden – biologist would call it an unfortunate, or disadvantageous “mutation”.

By: cyberflo999

cyberflo999 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 (2-) …
@Eastleigh6 (2-) draw, like they did, a grid and set rules for the colouring of the boxes. Once you reach the bottom, you do it again, or continue, with the same set of rules, but add that rule: if you color one next to one already coloured, then both turn another colour, or their colour disappear. With a simple set of rules – maybe not as simple as this one but you get the idea, an iterative process -, a great number of iterations, of coloring the grid might get you a pattern.

By: cyberflo999

cyberflo999 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 (1-)It …
@Eastleigh6 (1-)It is absolutely amazing, yes! So amazing to us, in fact, that it seems engineered by a greater mind. But people have looked at that particular aspect of the world – mathematicians, physicists, biologists – and tried to understand how structures can manifest themselves at various scales giving us this sense of intelligent design.
First, some of them – mathematicians – have noticed the following:

By: WoodstockHippie1969

WoodstockHippie1969 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

ChristopherJSykes …
ChristopherJSykes Rocks !!!

By: Eastleigh6

Eastleigh6 — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@TheFelzix i’d …
@TheFelzix i’d rather agree with that

By: TheFelzix

TheFelzix — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 It’s …
@Eastleigh6 It’s wrong to say that it cannot be intelligently designed, but it’s also wrong to say that it must be.

By: ElliotovHull

ElliotovHull — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

cool i always …
cool i always wondered how fire worked

By: dietermauer

dietermauer — Sun, 09 May 2010 00:58:26 +0000

@Eastleigh6 He is …
@Eastleigh6 He is one of that persons, that is convinced, that all these “things” arent designed.